Comparative effectiveness of tofacitinib and tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in real-world practice: a prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of tofacitinib vs tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in Korean patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: The study used data from a single academic referral hospital's registries of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and tofacitinib and examined remission rates based on the disease activity score (DAS)28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) after 12 months. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) for achieving remission with tofacitinib compared with TNFi, adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: This analysis included 665 patients (200 on tofacitinib and 455 on TNFi) who were followed up for at least 12 months. Of these, 96 patients in the tofacitinib group (48.0%) and 409 patients in the TNFi group (89.9%) were treatment-naïve to bDMARDs. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed no significant difference in the remission rates between the two groups (18.0% vs 19.6%, p = 0.640). Multivariable analysis demonstrated comparable remission rates with tofacitinib and TNFi (OR 1.204, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.720-2.013). In the subpopulation naïve to JAKi and bDMARD, tofacitinib showed better remission rates than TNFi (OR 1.867, 95% CI 1.033-3.377). Tofacitinib had more adverse events (AEs) but similar rates of serious AEs (SAEs) to TNFi. CONCLUSION: In real-world settings, there was no significant difference in remission rates at 12 months between the tofacitinib and TNFi groups. In terms of safety, tofacitinib exhibited a higher incidence of AEs compared with TNFi, while the occurrence of SAEs was comparable between the groups. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02602704.

Increased risk of herpes zoster with tofacitinib treatment in Korean patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a single-center prospective study.

We aimed to determine the risk of herpes zoster (HZ) in Korean rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients on tofacitinib compared with tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment. From the prospective cohorts of RA patients who started tofacitinib or TNFi in an academic referral hospital in Korea, patients who started tofacitinib between March 2017 and May 2021 and those who started TNFi between July 2011 and May 2021 were included. Baseline characteristics of tofacitinib and TNFi users were balanced through inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score including age, disease activity of RA and medication use. The incidence rate of HZ in each group and incidence rate ratio (IRR) were calculated. A total of 912 patients were included: 200 tofacitinib and 712 TNFi users. There were 20 cases of HZ among tofacitinib users and 36 among TNFi users during observation period of 331.4 person-years (PYs) and 1950.7 PYs, respectively. In IPTW analysis with a balanced sample, IRR of HZ was 8.33 (95% confidence interval 3.05-22.76). Tofacitinib use increased the risk of HZ compared with TNFi in Korean patients with RA, but the rate of serious HZ or permanent discontinuation of tofacitinib due to HZ event was low.

Comparisons of treatment satisfaction and health-related quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tofacitinib and adalimumab.

BACKGROUND: As significant advances in the field of treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), there is a great need to identify the healthcare outcomes such as treatment satisfaction and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients with various treatment options. This study aims to identify the difference in the treatment satisfaction and HRQoL of patients with RA using different treatment options, by comparing the treatment satisfaction and HRQoL in patients with RA treated with tofacitinib and adalimumab in real-world settings in Korea, using propensity score methods. METHODS: In this non-interventional, multicenter, cross-sectional study (NCT03703817), a total of 410 patients with RA diagnosis were recruited in 21 university-based hospitals throughout Korea. The treatment satisfaction and HRQoL were assessed using the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) and EQ-5D questionnaires self-reported by the patients. This study compared outcomes between two drug groups in unweighted, greedy matching, and stabilized inverse probability of treatment weight (IPTW) samples using propensity score. RESULTS: In all three samples, tofacitinib group showed higher convenience domain of TSQM than that in the adalimumab group, but not effectiveness, side effects, and global satisfaction domains. Multivariable analysis using the covariates of demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants also showed consistent results in TSQM. No statistical difference in EQ-5D-based HRQoL was identified between two drug groups in all three samples. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified that tofacitinib shows higher treatment satisfaction in the convenience domain of TSQM rather than adalimumab, suggesting that various factors such as drug formulation, route or frequency of administration, and storage can have an impact on the treatment satisfaction, especially the convenience domain. These findings may be useful to patients and physicians when determining treatment options. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03703817.

Safety and effectiveness of tofacitinib in Korean adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A post-marketing surveillance study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this article is to assess the safety and effectiveness of tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in routine clinical settings in Korea. METHODS: This is a prospective, multi-centre post-marketing surveillance study. Data were prospectively collected within 6 months after the start of tofacitinib therapy. Safety was evaluated based on the presence of adverse events (AEs) observed in patients who received at least one dose of tofacitinib. Effectiveness was assessed according to the proportion of patients who achieved low disease activity and remission, American College of Rheumatology 20 criteria (ACR20), European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response, and change of Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints (DAS28). RESULTS: The incidence rates [patients with events per 100 patient-years (PY)] of AEs and serious AEs were 56.92 and 10.69, respectively. Regarding AEs of special interest, the incidence rates were 4.33 per 100 PY for serious infections and infestations, 5.78 per 100 PY for herpes zoster, no event of tuberculosis, 0.29 per 100 PY for malignancy, 0.29 per 100 PY for venous thromboembolism (one event of deep vein thrombosis and no event of pulmonary embolism), 0.87 per 100 PY for major adverse cardiovascular event, and 0.58 per 100 PY for mortality. Moreover, ∼40.48% and 21.60% of patients achieved low disease activity and remission of DAS28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate. The EULAR response was classified as good responders with 39.12% in the DAS28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate. CONCLUSIONS: The benefit/risk profile of tofacitinib in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis in routine clinical settings in Korea was similar to long-term clinical trial data.

Real-world treatment patterns for atopic dermatitis in South Korea.

The phenotypes of atopic dermatitis (AD) are diverse, and ethnic differences have been suggested. To date, few studies have explored large-scale national data on the treatment patterns of AD in Asians. Therefore, we aimed to examine real-world treatment patterns for AD, including the probability of discontinuation of AD treatment and restart after discontinuation. A retrospective observational study was conducted using the nationwide healthcare database in South Korea between January 1, 2016 to July 31, 2020. We identified 944,559 pediatric patients and 1,066,453 adults with AD. Topical corticosteroids and antihistamines were the most commonly prescribed medications in all age groups. The frequency of topical corticosteroid prescription decreased as the age increased. Although immunosuppressive drugs were not widely used in both children and adults, cyclosporine was the most frequently prescribed immunosuppressant, particularly among those aged 12 years or more (1-2%). Pediatric patients were more likely to discontinue treatment than adult patients. Treatment restart for moderate-to-severe AD was earlier than that for overall AD. In conclusion, significant differences were observed in the treatment patterns of AD between pediatric and adult patients. These findings will improve our understanding of the latest treatment patterns for AD, which may contribute to decision-making in clinical practice.

Treatment pattern, satisfaction, and productivity loss of patients with ankylosing spondylitis treated with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in Korea: A multicenter cross-sectional observational study.

AIM: To provide in-depth understanding of real-world tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment patterns in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and treatment satisfaction, productivity loss, and associated factors. METHODS: This was a multicenter observational hybrid retrospective chart review and cross-sectional survey study. Disease activity and physical functioning were measured using the Bath AS Disease Activity Index and Bath AS Functional Index, respectively. Treatment satisfaction was determined with the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM). Productivity loss was evaluated using the Korean version of the World Health Organization-Health and Work Performance Questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 497 patients were enrolled (mean age 40.3 years, 85.3% male, mean AS duration 10 years). The mean duration of TNFi treatment was 6.2 years. Among the four TNFi considered, adalimumab (39.6%) and etanercept (23.5%) were most commonly used at study enrollment. The TSQM convenience domain score was lower than scores in the effectiveness, adverse effects, and global satisfaction domains. Subcutaneous syringe-type injection and intravenous injection were associated with lower patient convenience satisfaction than subcutaneous pen-type injection. Increased costs of lost productivity time were associated with female sex, unemployed status, and higher disease activity. CONCLUSIONS: The most frequently prescribed TNFi was adalimumab, followed by etanercept. Etanercept was used for the longest duration. More convenient treatment options may enhance overall treatment satisfaction. Considerable loss in productivity due to AS was observed in this study. To reflect patients' perspectives, further attention should be paid to factors associated with treatment satisfaction and productivity loss when selecting treatment options.

Real-World Incidence of Suboptimal Response to Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Therapy for Ulcerative Colitis: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.

Background/Aims: Although anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents have been widely used to treat ulcerative colitis (UC), the real-world incidence of suboptimal response to anti-TNF agents has not been thoroughly investigated, especially among Asians. Methods: Using the Korean National Health Insurance database, we collected data on UC patients who initiated anti-TNF agents between July 1, 2014, and June 30, 2017. We assessed suboptimal responses, including anti-TNF discontinuation or dose escalation, switching to other biologics, augmentation with a non-biologic therapy, and the requirement for colectomy. Results: A total of 1,268 patients were included as new anti-TNF users (infliximab 713, adalimumab 433, golimumab 122). The proportion of patients who experienced at least one suboptimal response within 1 year among all patients was 63.5%, including 59.1%, 69.5%, and 68.0% of patients treated with infliximab, adalimumab, and golimumab, respectively. The cumulative incidences of at least one suboptimal response over time were 41.5%, 63.7%, 80.5%, and 87.1% at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. Cox proportional hazards modeling revealed that adalimumab was associated with a higher risk of at least one suboptimal response (hazard ratio [HR], 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13 to 1.48), dose escalation (HR, 4.35; 95% CI, 2.97 to 6.38) and discontinuation (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.52) than infliximab. Golimumab was associated with a higher risk of switching to other biologics than infliximab (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.21 to 2.60). Conclusions: More than half of Korean UC patients had suboptimal responses to anti-TNF agents within 1 year. UC patients treated with infliximab might be less prone to suboptimal responses than those treated with adalimumab or golimumab.

Dose Reduction of Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor and its Effect on Medical Costs for Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis.

INTRODUCTION: Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) may be administered at a reduced dose to patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) for various reasons. However, in practice, there is insufficient evidence of how the dose reduction of TNFi is implemented and the amount of medical costs it reduces. In this study, we investigated treatment patterns among patients with AS who were administered various TNFis. The effect on medical costs related to AS was also investigated using Korea's insurance claims database. METHODS: From the insurance claims database of the Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service in South Korea, patients with AS newly treated with TNFis (etanercept, adalimumab, golimumab, and infliximab) between July 1, 2013, and June 30, 2016, were enrolled. Patients treated with the TNFis were followed up for 2 years. Treatment patterns (continuation and discontinuation of TNFi) and dose reduction (< 50% of recommended dose) in patients who continued treatment were analyzed and compared among the TNFi groups using the Chi-square test. Healthcare costs between the dose reduction and maintenance groups were compared using general linear modeling. RESULTS: Of 1352 patients, 764 (56.51%) continued using TNFis for 2 years, and 17.8% of these were administered reduced doses. TNFi dose reduction was the most frequent in 36 (24.83%) patients using etanercept, followed by those using adalimumab (21.97%), golimumab (11.70%), and infliximab (11.98%) (p = 0.0028). For each TNFi group, the total healthcare cost significantly decreased, that is, by 24.85% for adalimumab, 31.80% for etanercept, 26.34% for golimumab, and 35.52% for infliximab (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: TNFi dose reduction was identified in 17.8% of the patients with AS, and the patterns were different for each TNFi. Additionally, the dose reductions significantly reduced the medical costs associated with AS, that is, from 24.85 to 35.52% of the total medical expenditure.

The risk factors and incidence of major infectious diseases in patients with ankylosing spondylitis receiving tumor necrosis factor inhibitors.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the risk factor and incidence of infections in patients receiving tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) therapy for ankylosing spondylitis using data from the national health insurance service. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. Data regarding patients with ankylosing spondylitis prescribed TNFis were obtained from an insurance claims database of the Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service in Korea. Outcomes used were incidence rates of serious infection, pneumonia, tuberculosis, and herpes zoster during the follow-up period as well as the relationship between each TNFi and sex, hazard ratio (HR) of infection-related risk factors, and incidence of infections. RESULTS: A total of 2515 patients were included. There were no significant differences among the hazard ratios of TNFis for serious infection, pneumonia, and herpes zoster. However, the hazard ratio of tuberculosis was significantly higher for infliximab than for etanercept (adjusted HR 8.40 [95% confidence interval: 1.06-66.91]). In the subgroup analysis by sex, women treated with golimumab had a significantly higher hazard of herpes zoster than those treated with etanercept (adjusted HR 12.40 [95% confidence interval: 1.40-109.58]). CONCLUSION: We recommend that risk factors for these infectious diseases be identified prior to prescribing TNFis in these patients.

Comparative Cost-Effectiveness of Tofacitinib With Continuing Conventional Synthetic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs for Active Rheumatoid Arthritis in South Korea.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of initiating treatment with tofacitinib and subsequently incorporating it into a conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (csDMARD) treatment sequence and to compare the cost-effectiveness of this sequence with that of continuing csDMARDs alone in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: A cohort-based Markov model was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of two tofacitinib treatment sequences compared with that of continuing the csDMARD treatment sequence over a lifetime. Of the two tofacitinib sequences, the first consisted of initial tofacitinib treatment followed by biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) and the second consisted of csDMARD treatments followed by tofacitinib. A third treatment sequence, continuing the csDMARD treatment sequence before starting bDMARDs, was used as a comparator. Efficacy was assessed using the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response rates (ACR 20, ACR 50, and ACR 70) after 6 months, which were converted to changes in the health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI) score. Utility was estimated by mapping from the HAQ-DI score, costs were analyzed from a Korean societal perspective, and outcomes were considered in terms of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed to assess the robustness of the model. RESULTS: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios over a lifetime for starting with tofacitinib and incorporating tofacitinib into the csDMARD treatment sequence versus continuing csDMARDs only were US$14,537 per QALY and US$7,086 per QALY, respectively. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of these results. CONCLUSION: Starting with tofacitinib and incorporating it into a csDMARDs treatment sequence is cost-effective compared to continuing csDMARDs alone in patients with RA.

Association of Hand Grip Strength and Cardiometabolic Markers in Korean Adult Population: The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2015-2016.

BACKGROUND: Muscle strength has been suggested as a cardiovascular marker. The aim of this study was to examine the associations between hand grip strength and biomarkers of cardiovascular disease in the Korean population. METHODS: A total of 9,083 participants aged 20-80 years from Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2015-2016 were investigated. RESULTS: Among men, both relative and dominant hand grip strength showed a positive association with diastolic blood pressure in those aged 65-80 years (95% confidence interval, P-value of dominant and relative hand grip strength: ß=0.06, 0.01; P<0.05). Among women, relative and dominant hand grip strength showed a positive relationship to diastolic blood pressure in those aged 20-64 years (ß=0.06, 0.01; P<0.001). Body mass index was positively associated with dominant hand grip strength in younger women (ß=0.18, P<0.05), whereas it was positively associated with relative hand grip strength in all sex and age groups. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein showed a negative association with relative and dominant hand grip strength in all women, although the same association was observed only in younger men. Diabetes was inversely related to hand grip strength in younger women and men. CONCLUSION: Increased hand grip strength may be associated with lower C-reactive protein in women and with less risk of diabetes in the Korean adult population. Further prospective studies are needed for the determination of causality between cardiometabolic markers and hand grip strength.

Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in patients from the Asia-Pacific region: Post-hoc analyses of pooled clinical study data.

AIM: We report tofacitinib efficacy and safety in Asia-Pacific patients who participated in the rheumatoid arthritis (RA) clinical development program. METHOD: This post-hoc analysis included pooled data from patients with RA in the Asia-Pacific region treated with tofacitinib with/without conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in Phase (P)1, 2, 3, and long-term extension (LTE) studies (one LTE ongoing; January 2016 data-cut). Efficacy was assessed over 24 months in patients who received tofacitinib 5 (N = 397) or 10 (N = 382) mg twice daily or placebo (N = 243) in three P2 and five P3 studies. Endpoints included American College of Rheumatology (ACR)20/50/70 responses, Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-4[ESR]) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission rates, and change from baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (∆HAQ-DI). Safety data pooled over 92 months from one P1, four P2, six P3, and two LTE studies for all tofacitinib doses (N = 1464) included incidence rates (IRs) (patients with events/100 patient-years) for adverse events (AEs) of special interest. RESULTS: At month 3, patients receiving tofacitinib 5/10 mg twice daily improved vs placebo in ACR20 (69.2%/77.9% vs 27.5%), ACR50 (36.9%/44.4% vs 9.5%), and ACR70 (15.1%/22.4% vs 2.7%) responses, remission rates for DAS28-4(ESR) (8.5%/18.5% vs 2.6%) and CDAI (6.1%/12.3% vs 0.5%), and ∆HAQ-DI (-0.5/-0.6 vs -0.1); improvements were sustained through 24 months. IRs (95% CI) were 9.4 (8.5, 10.3) for serious AEs, 9.1 (8.3, 10.1) for discontinuations due to AEs, 3.7 (3.2, 4.3) for serious infections, 5.9 (5.2, 6.7) for herpes zoster, and 0.8 (0.6, 1.1) for malignancies (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer). CONCLUSION: In Asia-Pacific patients, tofacitinib improved signs/symptoms over 24 months. Safety over 92 months was generally consistent with global tofacitinib studies; however, infection IRs were higher in Asia-Pacific patients.

The Relationships between Addiction to Highly Caffeinated Drinks, Burnout, and Attention-Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the addiction to highly caffeinated drinks among university students, and we investigated the relationships between smartphone addiction, depression, anxiety, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), burnout, self-esteem, impulsiveness in high caffeine drink addiction risk group (high caffeine group). We also compared these mental health factors differences between the high caffeine group and the control group; and, investigated the relative risk between the independent variables of the high caffeine group. METHODS: This study was conducted in Korea, from June 2015 to July 2016. A set of questionnaires was administered on 511 college students. RESULTS: The participants who belonged to the high caffeine group were more likely to demonstrate the symptoms of ADHD and higher levels of burnout and impulsiveness. Further, the results of logistic regression analysis confirmed the association between the high caffeine group and burnout. CONCLUSION: These behaviors among university students addicted to highly caffeinated drinks suggests the need for timely and effective interventions for those at risk of addiction.

A multicenter, randomized, open-label pilot trial assessing the efficacy and safety of etanercept 50 mg twice weekly followed by etanercept 25 mg twice weekly, the combination of etanercept 25 mg twice weekly and acitretin, and acitretin alone in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Etanercept, a soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor, and acitretin have been shown to be effective in treating psoriasis. Acitretin is widely used in Korea. However, the combination of etanercept plus acitretin has not been evaluated among Korean patients with psoriasis. The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with etanercept and acitretin in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS: Sixty patients with psoriasis were randomized to receive etanercept 50 mg twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks followed by etanercept 25 mg BIW for 12 weeks (ETN-ETN); etanercept 25 mg BIW plus acitretin 10 mg twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks (ETN-ACT); or acitretin 10 mg BID for 24 weeks (ACT). The primary efficacy measurement was the proportion of patients achieving 75 % improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) at week 24. Secondary end points included 50 % improvement in PASI (PASI 50) at week 24 and clear/almost-clear by Physician Global Assessment (PGA) at each visit through week 24. RESULTS: The proportions of patients achieving PASI 75, PASI 50, and PGA clear/almost-clear at week 24 in the ETN-ETN (52.4, 71.4, and 52.4 %, respectively) and ETN-ACT groups (57.9, 84.2, and 52.6 %, respectively) were higher than in the ACT group (22.2, 44.4, and 16.7 %, respectively). The incidence of adverse events was similar across all arms. This was an open-label study with a small number of patients. CONCLUSION: In Korean patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, etanercept alone or in combination with acitretin was more effective than acitretin. All treatments were well tolerated throughout the study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered on July 7, 2009 at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00936065 .

Difference of body compositional changes according to the presence of weight cycling in a community-based weight control program.

Many obese people who try to control body weight experience weight cycling (WC). The present study evaluated the importance of WC in a community-based obesity intervention program. We analyzed the data of 109 Korean participants (86% women) among 177 subjects who had completed a 12-week intervention program at two public health centers in Korea from April to December, 2007. Completion of a self-administrated questionnaire at baseline was used to obtain anthropometric measurements, and laboratory testing was done before and after the program. Differences in body composition change and obesity-related life style between the two groups were compared with respect to WC and non-weight cycling (NWC). After 12 weeks, both groups showed reductions in weight, waist circumference, and body mass index. The group differences were not significant. However, significant differences were evident for the WC group compared to the NWC group in fat percent mass (WC vs. NWC, -3.49+/-2.31% vs. -4.65+/-2.59%, P=0.01), fat free mass (WC vs. NWC, -0.95+/-1.37 kg vs. -0.38+/-1.05 kg, P=0.01), and total cholesterol (WC vs. NWC, -3.32+/-14.63 vs. -16.54+/-32.39, P=0.005). In conducting a community-based weight control program that predominantly targets women, changes of body composition and total cholesterol may be less effective in weight cyclers than in non-weight cyclers.